What If Steampunk Hurts?

Roaring Twenties fashion reimagined (jwoodford35)
Roaring Twenties fashion reimagined (jwoodford35)

What should steampunks do if their art or fiction or roleplaying hurts others? Stop and abandon something that’s been part of the steampunk culture for years? Or ignore the feelings of others and have “fun”?

It’s a relevant question because the Victorian era had a lot of problems, several of which have found their way into steampunk even if we’re not always aware of it.

Racism is an obvious problem. It was prevalent during the nineteenth and much of the twentieth century in Western countries. It’s present today. Artworks, costumes and stories that invoke themes of colonialism or involve racial stereotypes may offend others even if the average steampunk enthusiast sees no harm in them. After all, we’re not racists. It’s all in good fun!

Sure, but some people will be offended nevertheless. My question is not whether they should be, i.e., whether we can objectively determine whether recreating racial stereotypes for example is offensive. My question is whether someone’s feelings or perceptions matter when we ask ourselves if we should pursue an idea or storyline?

I don’t think so. To explain why, it may be useful to forget about racism for a moment and consider something that’s less controversial — queer steampunk fiction.

We know that there are people who object to overt displays of homosexuality in art or fiction. Some of them may be homophobes, others ignorant, others yet uncomfortable discussing homosexuality for whatever reason. They will be offended when they see homosexuality inserted in an aesthetic or genre they otherwise enjoy. Probably they shouldn’t be, but it’s not at all unrealistic to assume that there will be people who are.

Is that a reason to stop writing queer steampunk fiction? Is it a reason to pretend that there aren’t gay people in the steampunk community? Certainly not.

The issue is the same — some people are offended or hurt but steampunks don’t let it affect their behavior. Maybe they don’t even care because the people who don’t want homosexuality in steampunk are wrong.

So we make a distinction. One person’s hurt feelings matter more than someone else’s. If you’re a likable steampunk, we’ll care about your feelings. If you’re a bigot, we won’t.

Back to racism. If a person of color says he’s offended by something that’s to do with steampunk, we should listen up. But we shouldn’t shut up.

Just because some’s feelings are hurt doesn’t mean we should stop what we’re doing. It means we should more carefully examine what steampunk is about. It means we should be critical of our behavior, exchange ideas and discuss. It means we should wonder, for instance, whether recreating racial stereotypes is unacceptable. Maybe it is. But it isn’t unacceptable simply because someone says it hurts their feelings.


  1. *sarcasm engaged*

    As a person of Anglo-Scottish parentage, I am offended by steampunk’s reduction of a complex period in my culture’s history to a kitchy pastiche of high teas, strange facial hair and the collected diosyncrasies of Colonel Blimp.

    *sarcasm off*

Leave a reply