Welcome to the Smoking Lounge, your forum for all things steampunk, dieselpunk, Roaring Twenties retro and Golden Era nostalgia!
We are always anxious to welcome new members into our community, so please join us while we pour you a drink already! Know that there is a special thread for introductions as well as a handy User’s Guide that tells you all you ever want to know about the place.
Here's something that might be interesting:
Google Trends' analysis of how many times "steampunk" is searched for.
You can see a gradual increase in search entries throughout 2007 and 2008 with apparently Wired's "A Big Day for Steampunk" producing a spike in interest.
The rise seems to have come to an end though. Search entries are now at a stable 320 or so. What do you think it means?
On a sad side: Your terms - dieselpunk - do not have enough search volume to show graphs. *sigh*



Offline
I think diesel is sort of misleading in itself. Dieselpunk is the focus of a war that never ended with certain aesthetics. I think most people who are interested in dieselpunk end up being more interested in retrofuture, art deco, vintage industrial, and pulp. Dieselpunk is just not very appealing by itself as its very limited to certain concept. However, the time period from which dieselpunk is suppose to reside in is fantastic, and breaking out of the genre it what most of us end up doing.


Offline
I think it means people are looking for a new hype. I already told here that I saw many videos on YouTube being labeled Steampunk, although they had nothing steampunk at all. But because it was a hype, people searched for it a lot and if you wanted to have your video be seen, you labeled/tagged it steampunk.
I don't see many new steampunk tagged videos anymore in my subscription.
Steampunk makes things no longer different.
I wonder how Google counts: the number of time people searched for steampunk, or the number of hits, or the people searching and actually finding something? Because, if there's no content, you can't find it.


Offline
I've directed 3 people with questions about steampunk to the Lounge and the Gazette today, obviously google hasn't ranked us high enough yet!





Offline
I blame the global recession. A comparison between the two shows that both seem to peak around 2008/2009, then peter off a little up until now (obviously recession has more searches).
As a sidenote - the rise of the emo vs goth. The goths seem to be on a constant fall since the start of 2005, which appears to have also been the start of the rise of the emo. Emos appear to have peaked in the 2nd quarter of 2008, then have started to fall.
Taking this into consideration with steampunk, it is logical to contend that some of the emos became steampunk, then left... what will they take on next? 




Offline
It could go down and then spike again. The web is big and chaotic and some viral thing could drastically increase the interest in steampunk in the future. If I knew how exactly Google worked, I would be rich in no time, being in internet-marketing.


Offline
HildeKitten wrote:
I've directed 3 people with questions about steampunk to the Lounge and the Gazette today, obviously google hasn't ranked us high enough yet!
I agree wholeheartedly! Thanks for recommending us!
Ella Kremper wrote:
Taking this into consideration with steampunk, it is logical to contend that some of the emos became steampunk, then left... what will they take on next?
They're a plague!!? 



Offline
Compare and contrast:
The Steampunk Trend
The Product Life Cycle
The Analysis:
As a subcultural exercise, the future of Steampunk is essentially forged in iron as it prepares to move through the same cultural life cycle that affected its predecessor cultures of Goth, Punk and Rivet. The pattern begins with a lengthy period of exploration and development falling under the cultural radar until it is "discovered" or "consolidated". This phase sees a sharp rise in both underground and mainstream attention as the culture escalates rapidly towards its critical mass. Steampunk's present standing of attracting new adherents, a flourishing "scene" landscape and acting as the latest "alternative" trend charted by media outlets reflects this phase. A plateau will eventually be reached in which the essential tropes, rhetoric and style of the culture become immovably codified and the system runs on automatically through a period of stagnation. Early adopters who entered at the beginning of the consolidation phase will, with cries of the culture being found out and sold out, give way to the early majority who segue the transition to the formalized and stagnant version of the culture as pioneered by the early adopters. Following this is inevitable decline as subsequent generations find the subculture irrelevant to their needs, interests, tastes and values, finding an appeal only amongst the hangers-on, latest majority and cultural laggards for whom Steampunk will itself be "retro-2000's".
Offline
I suppose that's right. Steampunk's attracted many from other subcultures or people who didn't previously identify with any subculture (like myself I should say) but after a while, when steampunk is no longer new and exciting, many are likely to move on, to whatever is hot then.
I can quite assure you, we will persevere!



Offline
Indeed, some base level of die-hard fans will continue to enjoy the genre even as the gauntlet of "trend-worthiness" is passed on.





Offline